Sharpe Ratio
PublishedEfficiency: how much pace does a driver extract per unit of chaos?
Mathematics & Statistics · Purdue · Class of 2027
Quantitative research: rigorous models that explain why, not just predict that.
Most recently: a pre-registered study of how prediction markets priced all 104 matches of the 2026 World Cup. The market was better calibrated than my own model, the visible gap between venues turned out to be mostly house margin rather than disagreement, and the dislocation that opens at a goal is mostly untradeable once you check the depth behind it. See the study.
Wrapping up xResidual, my pre-registered study of how prediction markets priced the 2026 World Cup, including a September audit pass over the full pipeline. Finalizing the QuantF1 methodology paper for arXiv submission.
I'm a Math and Statistics senior at Purdue, graduating May 2027. My work sits at the intersection of quantitative finance, sports analytics, and applied machine learning. What interests me most is the mechanism behind a result: models whose predictions come with reasons attached.
Over the past two years I've self-built an implementation library covering the core syllabus of a graduate-level quantitative finance program: option pricing through exotics, credit risk models, factor models, portfolio optimization, time series analytics. More recently, I've been developing QuantF1: a hierarchical Bayesian study of how far a Formula 1 driver's skill can be separated from their machinery. The methodology paper is in preparation for arXiv.
Co-founder of UltraRice, fiscally sponsored by The Hack Foundation (d.b.a. Hack Club), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. UltraRice works on ultrasonic rice fortification for malnutrition in India, started at 17 and funded with $20,000+ in non-dilutive grants from Tyler Cowen's Emergent Ventures India (Mercatus Center, George Mason University) on the strength of independent research. Public financials at bank.hackclub.com/ultrarice. Before that, The Knowledge Society (2022), where UltraRice began as an end-of-year moonshot. Selected for the 2026 IMC Trading US Chess Academy, one of 20 brackets nationwide, finishing 7th in the qualifier.
Three threads of one instinct: rigorous models that explain why, not just predict that: risk-adjusted sports analytics, prediction-market efficiency, and systematic quantitative finance.
A hierarchical Bayesian study of 76,000 F1 laps (2022–25, PyMC/NUTS, AR(1) Student-t) examining how far a driver's skill can be separated from their machinery. Championship-points variance decomposes into roughly 70% pace, 26% conversion, 4% luck, isolating conversion as a measurable within-team skill; the cross-team split is only weakly identified, swinging 47–71% on the removal of a single team switch. Paper: arXiv, in preparation.
What surprised me. The within-team comparison is the part that identifies cleanly: teammates share machinery, so conversion separates as a measurable skill. The cross-team split does not. Removing a single mid-season team switch swings the variance share from 47% to 71%, which means the headline "how much is the driver" number rests on a handful of driver moves rather than on 76,000 laps. The honest version of this study reports that fragility instead of picking the flattering number, and that constraint shaped the whole paper.
Efficiency: how much pace does a driver extract per unit of chaos?
Controlled Aggression: which mistakes actually matter?
Behavior: how is performance delivered?
Skill vs Machinery: separating the driver from the car.
Resilience: what happens when things go wrong?
Context: when does a driver's execution work?
Repeatability: is this structural skill or situational brilliance?
A six-week live study of how prediction markets, Kalshi and Polymarket benchmarked against bookmaker consensus, priced all 104 matches of the 2026 World Cup. Eleven falsifiable predictions were pre-registered before kickoff on June 11 and graded in public when the tournament closed on July 19. The record, predictions, code and grading all stay up, together with a September correction that withdrew one of the study's findings after a follow-up audit.
The headline result is a negative one, and it is the point: a visible 12-cent dislocation opens at every goal, and the books empty before most of it can be taken. A second surviving result points the same way: the market under-reacts, booking about a third of the model's fair move across the 8 matches whose goal timeline validates against the final score, and undershooting on all 22 goals where the quote moved.
What nearly went wrong. My first pass at the harvest ledger returned +10.2¢ on 100% of goals. A number that good is not a discovery, it is a bug you have not found yet: the ledger credited a follower with the full price move while assuming the quote it was lifting would still be resting there. At the instant of a goal it is not. Gating on real depth inverted the result.
Correction, September 2026. A follow-up audit withdrew the study's cross-venue lead-lag finding: one venue's price had been read at a coarser sampling rate than the other's, and a market with no lead at all reproduces the published result. The correction sorts every result by whether it survives, the figures above are the ones that do, and the original write-up stays online unedited behind a banner.
The two that failed. P3 predicted the mean de-vigged cross-venue title gap would stay within 1pp through the final; graded at the close it was 3.98pp, because once teams resolve, Kalshi's winner field stops being a probability distribution at all. P10 predicted the documented goal-overreaction fade would net positive; it returned −0.285pp per trade. There was nothing to fade: the market under-reacts to goals rather than over-reacting. I said in advance that publishing either result was the point.
Where the CLV actually came from. Split by market, the advance-to-knockout lane closed 74% positive at +4.03pp mean; the deeper reach-round lanes all carried negative mean CLV (reach-QF: 50% positive, −7.06pp). The simulated paper-trading book finished +$148 on a notional $1,452, no capital at risk, and split by lane it says more than the total does. The advance lane made +$181 and is the one market where closing-line value also backs the model. The reach-round lane made +$88 with no such support, so that part is outcome rather than edge, and the two lanes flagged as edgeless before trading lost $117. Two cautions: the 21 advance positions resolve on one group stage, so their hit rate is nearer one correlated bet than 21 independent edges, and the CLV is measured on the model's forecasts rather than the fills.
World Football Elo over 49k historical results, paired with a Skellam goal model.
Format-aware tournament sim: 40k iterations, FIFA best-thirds rules, Transfermarkt squad-value blending, and an empirical-Bayes confederation-bias correction.
Log-score and standardized z-scores with honest sigma discipline: expectation vs. outcome.
Order-book depth, spreads, and imbalance across Kalshi and Polymarket. The cross-venue price-discovery analysis built on this stage was later withdrawn; the capture itself was always full-resolution on both venues.
CORP isotonic reliability diagrams with consistency bands and three devig methods: falsifiable predictions pre-registered, graded in public on Jul 19.
Millisecond-stamped websocket capture of both order books across 86 matches, with auto goal-shock detection and the goal-overreaction fade test (P10).
Price logging ran 24/7 on an always-on Azure VM via systemd timers for the full six weeks, capturing 86 of the 104 matches on both venues; the rest were missed or caught on one venue only.
Every build stamps the git SHA, model parameters, and input fingerprints, and flags any published card that has drifted from the model behind it.
Across the math core, calibration, microstructure, simulation invariants, the confederation-bias correction, and data-integrity guards.
Implementation work spanning derivatives, portfolio construction, and systematic trading, including a prediction-market forecasting system that ran on a daily GitHub Actions schedule through the 2026 season.
End-to-end research and implementation library covering Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo for Asian/Barrier/Lookback/Rainbow exotics, Merton credit model, factor models, portfolio optimization, and time series analytics.
Contributor on ML@Purdue team project (PM: Eubene In) building a production forecasting system for Kalshi's weekly TSA checkpoint contracts. Owned the ARIMA/SARIMAX baseline track and walk-forward benchmark harness; implemented quarter-Kelly position sizing.
Seen enough? I'm open to full-time quant trading and research roles for 2027 — ask for a résumé or get in touch.
Built a multi-detector statistical anomaly ensemble (robust MAD z-scores, Mahalanobis distance on shrinkage covariance, trajectory deviation), validated against held-out anomaly classes and reported honestly where it failed to generalize. Diagnosed a covariance-estimation bias mis-scaling the Mahalanobis statistic, halving the false-positive rate at constant recall.
Designed large-scale multi-agent simulation experiments for statistical analysis and hypothesis testing under partial information, with reproducible Python pipelines for out-of-sample evaluation. Modeled sequential decision-making under uncertainty, achieving a 25% improvement in task accuracy through data-driven intervention design.
Engineered low-latency retrieval pipelines in Python using vector databases and Gemini APIs, cutting document-lookup latency ~90% and enabling sub-200ms real-time inference. Designed caching and batching workflows that reduced LLM response time 95% on cache hits, with end-to-end instrumentation for latency, throughput, and retrieval quality.
B.S. Mathematics & Statistics
In progress · Fall 2026 Foundations of Analysis · Elementary Stochastic Processes
Eleven articles across four tracks: prediction markets, the QuantF1 series, applied machine learning, and neurosymbolic AI.
Cross-venue microstructure from xResidual. Its central lead-lag claim was later withdrawn; see the correction.
Separating driver skill from machinery. The full series is listed in section 02.
Neural networks, recommenders, and adversarial robustness.
The recommender write-up is cited in Lavreniuk and Potapova (2025), Applied Information Technologies, Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University.
Hybrid symbolic-neural systems, written before the wave.
Repositories behind the articles above: a neurosymbolic disease-triage service (Flask, Dockerized, CI/CD), a study of adversarial attacks and defenses (FGSM, PGD, C&W), and the hybrid movie recommender that drew the citation above.
I'm looking for full-time quantitative trading and research roles starting after I graduate in May 2027. If you'd rather evaluate the work than take my word for it, xResidual is public end to end: the pre-registration, the public grading, and the code. I'll send a résumé the same day you ask, and I'm glad to walk through any part of the work.