Sharpe Ratio
PublishedEfficiency: how much pace does a driver extract per unit of chaos?
Mathematics & Statistics · Purdue · Class of 2027
Quantitative research: rigorous models that explain why, not just predict that.
Most recently: a pre-registered, six-week study of how prediction markets priced the 2026 World Cup. It found a real 600ms lead between venues, then showed that none of it survives contact with the order book. Read the write-up.
Writing up xResidual, a six-week live study of how prediction markets priced the 2026 World Cup: pre-registered in June, graded in public on July 19. Finalizing the QuantF1 methodology paper for arXiv submission.
I'm a Math and Statistics senior at Purdue, graduating May 2027. My work sits at the intersection of quantitative finance, sports analytics, and applied machine learning. What interests me most is the mechanism behind a result: models whose predictions come with reasons attached.
Over the past two years I've self-built an implementation library covering the core syllabus of a graduate-level quantitative finance program: option pricing through exotics, credit risk models, factor models, portfolio optimization, time series analytics. More recently, I've been developing QuantF1: a hierarchical Bayesian study of how far a Formula 1 driver's skill can be separated from their machinery. The methodology paper is in preparation for arXiv.
Co-founder of UltraRice, fiscally sponsored by The Hack Foundation (d.b.a. Hack Club), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. UltraRice works on ultrasonic rice fortification for malnutrition in India, started at 17 and funded with $20,000+ in non-dilutive grants from Tyler Cowen's Emergent Ventures India (Mercatus Center, George Mason University) on the strength of independent research. Public financials at bank.hackclub.com/ultrarice. Before that, The Knowledge Society (2022), where UltraRice began as an end-of-year moonshot. Selected for the 2026 IMC Trading US Chess Academy, one of 20 brackets nationwide, finishing 7th in the qualifier.
Three threads of one instinct: rigorous models that explain why, not just predict that: risk-adjusted sports analytics, prediction-market efficiency, and systematic quantitative finance.
A hierarchical Bayesian study of 76,000 F1 laps (2022–25, PyMC/NUTS, AR(1) Student-t) examining how far a driver's skill can be separated from their machinery. Championship-points variance decomposes into roughly 70% pace, 26% conversion, 4% luck, isolating conversion as a measurable within-team skill; the cross-team split is only weakly identified, swinging 47–71% on the removal of a single team switch. Paper: arXiv, in preparation.
What surprised me. The within-team comparison is the part that identifies cleanly: teammates share machinery, so conversion separates as a measurable skill. The cross-team split does not. Removing a single mid-season team switch swings the variance share from 47% to 71%, which means the headline "how much is the driver" number rests on a handful of driver moves rather than on 76,000 laps. The honest version of this study reports that fragility instead of picking the flattering number, and that constraint shaped the whole paper.
Efficiency: how much pace does a driver extract per unit of chaos?
Controlled Aggression: which mistakes actually matter?
Behavior: how is performance delivered?
Skill vs Machinery: separating the driver from the car.
Resilience: what happens when things go wrong?
Context: when does a driver's execution work?
Repeatability: is this structural skill or situational brilliance?
A six-week live study of how the sharpest forecasts on earth (prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket, benchmarked against bookmaker consensus) priced all 104 matches of the 2026 World Cup. Eleven falsifiable predictions were pre-registered before kickoff on June 11 and graded in public when the tournament closed on July 19. Every published figure resolves from the data artifact through generated macros, guarded by regression tests that fail on drift. The full record, predictions, code, and grading, stays up.
The headline result is a negative one, and it is the point: a visible, statistically clean 12-cent lead exists between venues, and adverse selection eats all of it. Measuring that honestly mattered more than reporting an edge that would not survive contact with the book.
What nearly went wrong. My first pass at the ledger returned +10.2¢ on 100% of goals. A number that good is not a discovery, it is a bug you have not found yet, and it was: the ledger credited a follower with the full price move while assuming the quote it was lifting would still be resting there. At the instant of a goal it is not. I had measured the size of an opportunity without checking whether anyone could take it. Gating the same ledger on real depth inverted the result, and that correction is the whole finding. The write-up walks through it.
The two that failed. P3 predicted the raw cross-venue title gap would stay inside 1pp; graded at the close it was 3.98pp, because once teams resolve, Kalshi's winner field stops being a probability distribution at all. P10 predicted the documented goal-overreaction fade would net positive; it returned −0.285pp per trade. That edge is arbed away on these venues, and I said in advance that publishing either result was the point.
Where the CLV actually came from. Split by market, the advance-to-knockout lane closed 74% positive at +4.03pp mean; the deeper reach-round lanes ran near coin-flip with badly negative means (reach-QF: 50%, −7.06pp). The simulated paper-trading book agreed independently, ending +$148 on a notional $1,452, no capital at risk, with the entire gain in that same advance lane and −$117 given back in lanes where I had no modelled edge. One robust edge, several expensive ways to lose it: that split is the finding, and it only shows up because the losing lanes were logged too.
World Football Elo over 49k historical results, paired with a Skellam goal model.
Format-aware tournament sim: 40k iterations, FIFA best-thirds rules, Transfermarkt squad-value blending, and an empirical-Bayes confederation-bias correction.
Log-score and standardized z-scores with honest sigma discipline: expectation vs. outcome.
Order-book depth, spreads, imbalance, and cross-venue price discovery across Kalshi and Polymarket.
CORP isotonic reliability diagrams with consistency bands and three devig methods: falsifiable predictions pre-registered, graded in public on Jul 19.
Millisecond-stamped websocket capture of both order books throughout every match, with auto goal-shock detection and the goal-overreaction fade test (P10).
Price logging ran 24/7 on an always-on Azure VM via systemd timers for the full six weeks. No kickoff was ever lost to a sleeping laptop.
Every build stamps the git SHA, model parameters, and input fingerprints, and flags any published card that has drifted from the model behind it.
Across the math core, calibration, microstructure, simulation invariants, the confederation-bias correction, and data-integrity guards.
Implementation work spanning derivatives, portfolio construction, and systematic trading, including a production prediction-market forecasting system currently paper-trading via daily GitHub Actions.
End-to-end research and implementation library covering Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo for Asian/Barrier/Lookback/Rainbow exotics, Merton credit model, factor models, portfolio optimization, and time series analytics.
Contributor on ML@Purdue team project (PM: Eubene In) building a production forecasting system for Kalshi's weekly TSA checkpoint contracts. Owned the ARIMA/SARIMAX baseline track and walk-forward benchmark harness; implemented quarter-Kelly position sizing.
Built a multi-detector statistical anomaly ensemble (robust MAD z-scores, Mahalanobis distance on shrinkage covariance, trajectory deviation), validated against held-out anomaly classes and reported honestly where it failed to generalize. Diagnosed a covariance-estimation bias mis-scaling the Mahalanobis statistic, halving the false-positive rate at constant recall.
Designed large-scale multi-agent simulation experiments for statistical analysis and hypothesis testing under partial information, with reproducible Python pipelines for out-of-sample evaluation. Modeled sequential decision-making under uncertainty, achieving a 25% improvement in task accuracy through data-driven intervention design.
Engineered low-latency retrieval pipelines in Python using vector databases and Gemini APIs, cutting document-lookup latency ~90% and enabling sub-200ms real-time inference. Designed caching and batching workflows that reduced LLM response time 95% on cache hits, with end-to-end instrumentation for latency, throughput, and retrieval quality.
B.S. Mathematics & Statistics
Planned · Fall 2026 Foundations of Analysis · Elementary Stochastic Processes
Eleven articles across four tracks. The flagship is the prediction-markets work: a negative result, published because a pre-registration you only report when it flatters you is not a pre-registration.
Cross-venue microstructure from xResidual: what tick data says about a speed advantage that does not become money.
Separating driver skill from machinery. The full series is listed in section 02.
Neural networks, recommenders, and adversarial robustness.
The recommender write-up is cited in Lavreniuk and Potapova (2025), Applied Information Technologies, Vasyl' Stus Donetsk National University.
Hybrid symbolic-neural systems, written before the wave.
Repositories behind the articles above: a neurosymbolic disease-triage service (Flask, Dockerized, CI/CD), a study of adversarial attacks and defenses (FGSM, PGD, C&W), and the hybrid movie recommender that drew the citation above.
I'm always interested in discussing research, collaborating on projects, or exploring new opportunities in quantitative finance, machine learning, and AI.